Thursday, June 13, 2013

The Other Side of the Coin on Disco Dan, Or It's Time to Adapt

Disco's History with Kris Letang

There's another clip (fast-forward to the 21-minute mark) from early in the 2010-11 season of Inside Penguins Hockey.  It's actually fairly insightful, too.   Kris Letang was coming off a season where he'd scored only 3 goals in the regular season (but managed to score 5 in the playoffs).    Letang had yet to have a "breakout" or "All-Star" season.

Dan Bylsma is bugging Letang about needing to play aggressively--all the time.

As a matter of fact, Dan Byslma had to bug Letang about playing aggressively at this stage of Letang's career.   It's easily forgotten that Disco's first move as head-coach was to make a then-21-year-old Letang a healthy scratch.  It's easily forgotten that Disco and his coaches encouraged Letang to play with his head-up (they constantly reminded him of this in 2009) and that they tolerated Letang's mistakes of aggression when he had his head-up and was playing the way they wanted him to play.

Because back Dan Bylsma became the head coach of the Pittsburgh Penguins, Kris Letang had all the talent to be a productive offensive defenseman, but Letang hadn't yet figured out how to produce offensively in the NHL.

Flash forward to 2013.   Letang is a point-per-game defenseman.  Letang's pretty much been a point-per-game defenseman for the past two years (in the regular season and the playoffs).  Yes, he plays with Crosby and Malkin, but so have other defensemen, and they don't score a point per game.   (Scoring a point-per-game with Crosby and Malkin isn't as easy as Letang makes it look.)

Letang produces offesnively now.   Letang's elite enough offensively that he can make game-changing plays (see the pass for Tyler Kennedy's first goal in Game 5 of the New York Islanders series) when he's having an otherwise "meh" or less game.  

Letang now requires a different type of coaching than he once did.   Encouraging aggression--which, to be blunt, Bylsma had to do in order to get Letang to become an elite offensive player in the first place--is (aside from the power play, where Letang occasionally reverts to his younger terrified-to-make-a-play-self) no longer what's holding Kris Letang back from making the most of his talents.


So, What Now?

This blog post may be moot point because Letang may want more money than the Penguins are willing to give him, and some other team and some other coach will have to figure out how to get Letang to "balance" offense with responsible defensive play.   (I'm of the opinion an actual large top-4 defensive partner would help a whole heck of a lot and that any team investing in Letang would be wise to invest in getting the best from him with an appropriate top-4 (not insanely expensive, just legitimately large and top-4) partner.)  Or some other team or some other coach will have another defenseman or two who focuses on "defense" and Letang's role is more to "roam wild," as he has the past couple of seasons in Pittsburgh.

But should Letang remain in Pittsburgh and should Byslma remain his coach.   Letang's not 23 anymore.   He's produced to elite levels offensively, and he's even been able to play defense effectively in the league too.   (Letang was a player Bylsma trusted to play against Marian Hossa in the Cup Finals when he was all of 22.)

Yet Letang needs different coaching now than he did back when Bylsma started coaching him.   Not coaching that corrected what his "old" issues used to be (fear of making mistakes, unable to assert himself).   Now, he needs coaching that corrects his "new" issues.  A league that scouts him to adjust to what they know he can do offensively.   A league that knows his tendencies to be--well--aggressive, as Bylsma has long encouraged him to be in order to make the most of his physical talents.

And not to coach the aggression or the edge out of him (the last thing any team should want is a tentative Kris Letang, afraid to make plays).  But to transform the aggression, once so necessary, into assertiveness.

It's already happened in parts of Letang's game.   His penalty minutes per game went from over 1 per game in his breakout 2010-11 season to .04 per 60 minutes TOI this season (which is an insane level of improvement, and should give pause to the consideration that Letang won't get any better as a player than he is today).  If you wondered how Pittsburgh's PK suddenly improved in the 2013 postseason, look no further than the fact that Letang--generally--played "assertively" really well on the PK (far better than he did on the PK in the regular season).

But the salary cap is the salary cap, and the Penguins have internal numbers for what they're willing to pay Letang, and Letang has numbers he wants to be paid, and those numbers may not align given that the NHL is a business, first and foremost.  Should Letang move on and be some other coach's player to harness and handle, Bylsma still could--and should-- learn something from his experience coaching Letang.

That players change and grow and that once was needed for a particular player or team may not be what is needed for the player to perform well at this stage.

That line-matching might be needed to get the most from an elite talent.

That a personality might be the same, but the talent might be need to be positioned differently.

That adapting to find what works now is more important than sticking to what once worked so well.

For Bylsma to win another Cup with the Penguins, he'll have to adapt and adjust.  Because even though many of the players he's coaching are the same and  may even have the same temperaments and be the same people they've always been, they're different players than they used to be, with different teammates, and thus require new "handling," "coaching," and "deployment" on and off the ice.

And if Dan Bylsma wants to be coaching the Penguins for the length of his contract extension--the name of the game is to adapt and adjust.   Not just for elite players, but for elite coaches, too.

In Defense of Disco Dan


Watch this clip.  It's from early in the 2010-11 season.  Dan Bylsma is wearing a microphone at a Pittsburgh Penguins practice.

Fast-forward to the 3:12 mark.   Kris Letang, at age 23, is starting to be mentioned as one of hockey's best defensemen for the first time in his NHL career.   Bylsma sees something he doesn't like from Letang during a routine, hum-drum practice drill.

He pulls Letang aside and offers correction.

I doubt Bylsma remembers this incident.  I doubt Letang remembers it.   I only remember it because I was new to management at that time in my life and because I remember watching that particular episode of Inside Penguins Hockey and thinking, "Wow--that's really good management.  I'd like to be able to manage people the way Bylsma just did."

Management that offers correction not by screaming and yelling and dressing down and denigrating and saying:  "You, as a human being, are not good enough."  

Management that maintains the highest of expectations by offering correction by saying, "Because of who you are and the talents you have, this is how you should play.   Because you have these talents, that play wasn't acceptable.  So, here, let me show you.  Make this play instead--because that's who you are and what you're capable of doing."

Management that is firm about maintaining the highest of expectations at all times.

In twenty seconds, Bylsma turns a young player's mistake in practice into affirmation of a young player's talents.  Turns a negative into a positive.

You want to know why Disco's stars spoke up for him?   You want to know why the Penguins were willing to extend his contract after yet another playoff disappointment?

If you're going to make mistakes and get corrected (because every hockey player on the planet will screw up at some point), do you want it to be done in a way that treats you like a human being, or one that treats you as less than human?

Come on.   The millionaire players want to be treated with respect, just like every other human on the planet.

Because when you have a coach who can offer actual, firm correction while BUILDING up a player, not tearing him down.   Because when you have a coach who did that, consistently enough, for players like James Neal and Kris Letang to become All-Stars under his watch.  When you have that coach, you give that coach a shot to figure out the stuff he still needs to figure out (you know, like putting those All-Stars in good position to succeed with appropriate linemates and defensive partners).

Because, whenever I watch this clip, of some humdrum drill in October 2010, I'm reminded of what good management looks like in elite organizations that want to get the best from talented employees.  And I'm struck by the fact that one little interaction between Disco and Letang is pretty much daily reality for Bylsma and all his players.

Say what you will, but correcting a player by saying, "Play to your abilities" clearly got better results--even with playoff disappointments--than what John Tortorella got from talented charges with a vastly different method, more dehumanizing method of correcting mistakes throughout his tenure in New York.

Just ask Kris Letang how much money some NHL team will pay for his services now as compared to the spring of 2010.   Just ask James Neal about that contract he signed with the Penguins last season.

And remember that those two players, once talented kids but ones who didn't produce at elite levels in the NHL, had a head coach in Dan Bylsma who offered enough affirming correction that those two kids are now highly productive--albeit far-more-expensive--NHL players.

The Kippy, Jan, & Jaromir History Lesson And Why Toews & Kane 2013 > Crosby & Malkin 2013 (Hint: Not Talent, Not Character)


Evgeni Malkin will be a Penguin until he turns 35.   With Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin signed to long-term contracts, the Pittsburgh Penguins will always be able to contend for the Stanley Cup.


Except the Penguins will always be a “pretender” among the finalists until the organization realizes star power alone is insufficient to win the Stanley Cup.


A Trip Back in Time

To realize how deeply the pervasive, insidious “stars can do it all” mentality pervades the Pittsburgh Penguins, let’s take a trip back in time to when Jaromir Jagr was undisputedly the NHL’s best position player (while a goalie named Hasek was racking up MVP awards for ridiculous goaltending).    Jaromir Jagr was the best player in the NHL.  Jaromir Jagr could dominate games by himself (and occasionally could win an elimination playoff game against a #1 seed on one good leg).  


In his late twenties, Jaromir Jagr insisted his best linemates were center Jan Hrdina and left winger Kip Miller.   Jagr was comfortable with Miller and Hrdina.  They meshed with his style.  Jagr won the Art Ross Trophy--and he racked up points when no one else in the NHL could score while playing with Kip Miller and Jan Hrdina.


Miller and Hrdina were legitimate NHL players, but not first-line players on a championship team.   But Penguins would always have hope for a championship with a player like Jagr on their squad, and Jagr, the game's best player, would get his Pittsburgh teams to the playoffs.


But with “Miller and Hrdina” as Jagr’s help, Jagr’s team--not the Jagr who was a better player at 28 than he was at 19--was never good enough to win another Cup.  



Meanwhile, Back in 2013

In 2013, the Chicago Blackhawks are in the Stanley Cup Finals.  Jonathan Toews and Patrick Kane are supposed to be, for the Blackhaws, what Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin are to the Pittsburgh Penguins.


Except, well.


Patrick Kane and Jonathan Toews have not been consistently good this playoff season.   The Blackhawks are up 1-0 in the Stanley Cup Finals, so some inconvenient facts are routinely dismissed when talking about how the Pittsburgh stars failed versus the Bruins (as compared to Chicago’s).  

The Nexus Of Pittsburgh's Playoff Issues: Were Elite Players Positioned to Succeed?

In 2013, Crosby, Malkin and Letang vs. Boston. 0 points.

Dan Bylsma, coaching stars he trusts, stars who produced on a power play that dominated through two round of the playoffs: “We had chances.”   Ray Shero: “I don’t think anyone would have expected our team to be shut down offensively.”


A look back at Pittsburgh history, though, tells us that Miller-Hrdina-Jagr worked fine if the goal was for Jaromir Jagr to amass regular season scoring titles.    A look back at the entire postseason (not merely the Boston series) clues a rational observer into the reality that Kunitz-Crosby-Dupuis performed the same way as Miller-Hrdina-Jagr did come the crucible that is the NHL postseason.   A line that was dominant in the regular season when the best player in the world is way better than everyone else on the ice was not effective enough come the postseason.  Rationality tells us that  Pascal Dupuis is a wonderful human being, terrific person, and  incredibly talented player, but he’s not a first line winger on a championship team.  (If you want a clue about a first line winger on a Cup champion, take a look at Marian Hossa of the Blackhawks, painful as that may be for Pittsburgh fans.)


Rationality states other, uncomfortable facts:  Pittsburgh’s All-Stars (and Tomas Vokoun and Paul Martin, to be fair) got them through the first two round of the playoffs (Malkin and Letang’s occasional giveaways typically covered over by man-advantage dominance).   Look at the statistics.   Pittsburgh’s power play (on which Crosby, Malkin, and Letang starred through two rounds) and highly effective penalty kill (though it’s surely easy to forget that Letang killed penalties really well given that we easily remember the bad and forget the good) got them past the Islanders and Senators.


But there were signs.   No 5-on-5 dominance at even-strength.   A Norris Trophy nominee with no consistent even-strength pairing that worked for more than a game or two.  


Kunitz-Crosby-Dupuis was never dominant at even-strength in the playoffs.


An effective “left” winger was never found for Evgeni Malkin and James Neal (and no, Jarome Iginla is not a left winger).  


Though Zdeno Chara plays best with Seidenberg (and didn’t play nearly as well against the Toronto Maple Leafs when paired with bottom-pairing defensemen) and Duncan Keith and Brent Seabrook are at their best as a tandem and Drew Doughty plays best with a steady partner like Rob Scuderi and Ryan Suter only found his game once he got paired with Jonas Brodin, the Penguins entered the postseason expecting their top-minutes eater on defense to play with one of Simon Despres, Mark Eaton, or Matt Niskanen (all players who would be fifth o rsixth defensemen, at best, on other conference finalists).    (Side note:  The issue of how much Pittsburgh should/should not pay Letang on a future contact is not for this post; the point here that Pittsburgh entered the postseason at a disadvantage compared to other teams who put their top defenseman in a better position to succeed.)


Sure, Pittsburgh’s stars should have “willed” their way to a point or two versus the Bruins.   And the lack of support for the All-Stars doesn’t excuse the nightmare that was Game 2.


But mental mistakes?    But an inability to find time and space?


Is it fair to ask if Beau Bennett could have created more space for Crosby?   Is it fair to ask if Pascal Dupuis would have been able to ignite a third line rather than stay on a first line that was producing very little at even-strength?   Is it fair to admit that pairing an undersized bottom-pairing defenseman with an undersized Norris Trophy nominee isn’t the way to get the best out of either player when it comes to postseason match-ups against elite, large power forwards and isn’t putting either player in the best position to succeed (and you surely didn’t see the best out of Kris Letang or Matt Nisaknen during the 2013 postseason, did you)?


The Condition for Future Championships

Jaromir Jagr really did say it best.    Of course, Jaromir Jagr in his twenties simply said, “Kippy and Jan and I have to get it going.”   And that, of course, is the attitude of young stars who don’t know any better.  Who think, because they’re so talented, they should just “will” a win--because, let’s be blunt, they can so often do just that on their own during the regular season and even against “really good” teams on occasion.


But the Penguins’ coaching staff and management should know better, and to learn better, they only need to look to the Blackhawks.


Toews and Kane were nowhere near as good through two rounds as Pittsburgh's stars.   They simply didn’t have to be.    


But Chicago’s in the Stanley Cup Finals, and Pittsburgh’s not.


Because Chicago had coverage for their stars when they got shut down.   And because Chicago--aggressively--puts their stars in the best position possible to succeed by adjusting lines and reuniting a struggling defenseman with a defensive partner who brought out the best in him.  


You want another championship in Pittsburgh with Crosby and Malkin at the helm?


The Penguins won’t win another Stanley Cup until Ray Shero and Dan Bylsma acknowledge that coverage--in the form of both personnel and personnel deployment-- for star players is a prerequisite condition for any future championships.


That means someone has to tell a young Sidney Crosby what no one dared to tell a young Jaromir Jagr.   “You need more help on your line to win another Cup.”


Does anyone in Pittsburgh actually know, believe, or realize what it took Jaromir Jagr a career to learn?


Because, if not, the Penguins must learn to be happy with entertainment, sellouts, and Art Ross trophies.    Because even the most elite players in the world win their Cups with appropriate support and fail to win it all without support.  


Don’t forget that, either, should someone tell you how great Toews and Kane are after the 2013 Cup Finals end.  Toews and Kane are great players--but to win it all, they’ll have had even greater support.


How about the Penguins make it an offseason priority to figure out what support their elite players need when matched up against other elite teams? How about the Penguins make their offseason priority finding the complementary personnel that will put their elite players in the best position possible to succeed, rather than saying, “They’re elite; they’ll be able to do it on their own!”?

How about the Penguins realize that no elite player or two or three--on their own--will ever be sufficient to win a championship?  And how about their general manager acts in accordance with that truth this offseason, and how about their coach acts in accordance with that truth come next season when it comes line-ups and defensive pairings?   And how about we stop hearing about how the Pens always have a chance to win because they had Sid and Geno and start talking about the Penguins as a team--not just stars--that truly covers each teammate well enough to have a shot at winning it all?  

Sunday, June 09, 2013

It's Hard to be the Favorites, but It's Worth It, So DO YOUR BEST EVERY YEAR




Translation:  It’s really hard to win the Stanley Cup, and no matter how good you are, bad things can happen, but you have to do as much as possible.  Because the chance to play with great players like this doesn’t come around often, and even if you do all of that I said, you’re probably not going to win because it’s really, really hard to win.  But, at least if you do all that stuff, you’re actually putting yourself in the best spot to win.   And you haven’t put yourself in the best shot to win unless you really do all that stuff I mentioned.  

Takeaways:  Accept it's hard to be favored to win the Stanley Cup every year.  Accept that realistically high expectations are a good kind of hard, to which you should give your best, because the opportunity will be gone before you know it.  

Action Items:    Do everything I just said. Don't let it take you as long to it took me to learn it, and don't make the same mistakes you made thinking me and Mario could do it all.   

The Best Players in the League are Gonna Have Off Nights--DURING the Playoffs!

                            

                Translation Doesn’t matter if you’re the greatest player in NHL history, you’re going to have an off game or two, and you’re going to have those nights IN the playoffs, too.   It’s the most horrible feeling in the world when you’re a great player and you don’t produce when your team most needs you to be on but you just don't have it.  You feel like the weight of the world is on your shoulders and you press like crazy and it still doesn’t work and it just sucks.   

                Takeaways:   There’s a psychology to what was happening with the Pittsburgh All-Stars in the 2013 Eastern Conference Finals. It was why Jagr once said he was “dying alive” when he could no longer score goals (no, Pittsburgh media, that quote never had anything to do with Jagr hating your city; it had everything to do with an elite talent fed up with himself because he couldn’t perform to his expected levels).   Crosby, Malkin, and Letang knew they HAD to produce for their team to win.   So they tried—and tried too hard to force plays that weren’t there.   Not because they didn’t care or because they were selfish or because they were dumb.  Because they were stars who were having really, really bad games, unable to produce when their team most needed them to do so against a very good opponent—and they knew their team was going down if they didn’t do SOMETHING.


Action Items:     Dealing with the “psychology” of superstars is never easy.    They’re used to being able to dominate.  And when what they usually do (dominate!) doesn’t work, they don’t typically react well.  They may not even know how to react.   They revert to doing things that ought not to be done, because, they can usually get that pass to work and create a scoring chance from the high-risk play that works against inferior competition in the regular season.  

   Somehow, you have to get the superstars to relax.    So, you have to give them help.  They need to know someone else can cover if they’re off, so they can just make a safe, simple, and smart play rather than force it.   But, psychologically, they also need someone to tell them what a 41-year-old Jagr might wish he could back and tell his 29-year-old self:   “Yo, kid, you have a ton of talent, but there’s no way you’re winning a Cup by yourself, so just relax and just play cause this slump isn't going to last forever."

    In upcoming seasons, SOMEONE, regardless of whether that’s a forty-one-year-old Jagr or a coach or whomever—actually has to get that message THROUGH to Pittsburgh's All-Stars.   It’s not so much “acquire a veteran” or “get a different coach” as it is “deal with immense pressure by reminding players they won’t succeed if they try to do it all themselves.”   Pittsburgh's biggest takeaway is to get THAT message through to their best players, such that they simply play hockey--and don't try to do what no human (no matter how gifted) can do.

It’s the Playoffs: Expect Us to Key in on Your Stars




                Translation:   In the regular season, coaches game-plan a little bit, but in the regular season, Crosby and Malkin and all the other All-Stars on the Penguins can run wild because they’re way more talented than most other guys on the ice.  But in the playoffs, coaches really game-plan hard for the game’s best players.   No matter how good those guys are, they’re going to have off games at some point, and somebody else is going to have to step up and cover for them. 

                Takeaways:   Back in the day, Jagr insisted he was fine with Jan Hrdina and Kip Miller as his linemates—and he won the NHL scoring title with Hrdina as his center and Miller as his left wing (literally—I watched it happen; Jagr was THAT good in his prime).   In the modern NHL, Dupuis-Crosby-Kunitz was the NHL’s best regular season line.   In the postseason, that line didn’t do a whole lot at even strength.    In the modern NHL playoffs, former MVPSs like Crosby and Malkin will be facing former Norris Trophy winners and Selke winners.  Strength on strength, talent on talent.     What works in the regular season won’t automatically translate to postseason success. 


                Action items:   There are several things Pittsburgh needs to do.  

            1.)   Plan for postseason success, not regular season success.  It is an entirely different thing to plan for postseason success than it is to plan for regular season success.   Bluntly, that means Pittsburgh better have 6 defensemen (not 3) capable of playing top-4 minutes if they hope to advance in the 2014 NHL playoffs.   It means the third and fourth lines need to be able to drive possession positively.   At its basic level, it means that a TEAM has to be constructed to cover when the inevitability of "stars" being shut down occurs.    

            2.)  Give your All-Stars linemates and partners who cover their relative weaknesses (which they have!) the best.   In the postseason, opponents will focus all their energy on shutting down your All-Stars.   What are your stars' "weak" points?  Because all talented players have them.  All of Pittsburgh's stars are guilty of trying to do "too much" when things get hard.   But, why?  Is it because no one can create time and space for them, so they try to create that time and space themselves (and fail)?  Is it because they're being asked to do something (dominate physically stronger opposition) they just can't do?   

            Look at when and why Crosby, Malkin, and Letang failed this postseason.   And, for any All-Star on your roster next season, openly acknowledge their weaknesses.   Find the defensive partner who can complement and cover; find the linemate who can create time and space. Because in the postseason, such coverage is necessary because All-Stars are going up against All-Stars, and their All-Stars are going to be keyed in on shutting down your All-Stars.  

        3.)   Make sure your depth guys can beat your opposition's depth guys:  Your All-Stars will fail at times.   Your team will have to cover when your All-Stars are shut down by other All-Stars.  You need a third liner or depth defenseman to come through with a game-winning goal: do you have the third liners and depth defensemen who can do that?   If you don't, can you find them?  

Teams—not Individuals—Win Stanley Cups


This is not All-Star.   You do not pick individual players.   This is team sport.”   -Jaromir Jagr, 2013


Translation:   Expecting an All-Star, or even a group of All-Stars, to win a playoff series on talent alone will not work in the modern NHL.   There's less of a difference between fourth line and first line talent than there once was.  A physical fourth liner can overpower a smaller, skilled first liner.  Teams are closer than they used to be.  Parity rules in the salary-cap driven NHL.    

Takeaway:   All-Stars need to play within a structured, team system.   All-Stars also need support from other players.  You can't expect a team of All-Stars to win a series just because they're All-Stars.  It's not enough to be talented in the current NHL.  


Action Item:  Pittsburgh's All-Star talents need help from teammates.  All Pittsburgh players must be willing to do the dirty work.  All Pittsburgh All-Stars must buy into the team system—whatever the team system is—and play to their talents within a system designed to maximize their talents.   The Penguins need to make sure their best players are on lines or defensive pairings with appropriate personnel.  The Penguins also need to make sure their stars are playing within a team system that brings out the best in their talents—and that their stars aren’t going “outside” the system in the hopes of creating something from nothing.   

Franchise Players Can’t Do It All

                                                 

                Translation:    Even when I was at my best, I couldn’t beat all five guys on the ice.  (Notice the stick-hold in front of the net?)  Neither can Crosby and Malkin.  The Penguins didn’t have enough puck support to beat our defense. 

                Takeaway:  Expecting Crosby and Malkin to “will” their way to take over a game is fine when playing borderline playoff teams in the regular season.  It might even work against lower-seeded playoff teams in early rounds.  It’s sheer lunacy against equally talented teams (teams that have trophy winners of their own). 


                Action Item:   Pittsburgh's All-Stars have to play within a structure that provides them with the support they need.   Tactics have to be adjusted when dealing with a talented opponent employing a great system.   Elite players need to play with players who help to create time and space when matched up against 5-man units.  

The NHL, the Trap, and Legal Interference Come the Playoffs




Translation:   Mario and I only scored 1 goal TOTAL in the 1996 Eastern Conference Finalsagainst Florida.   We couldn’t get past New Jersey in 2001.   Our teams back then weren’t built to beat the trap, and our teams weren’t built to deal with interference being legal.   Crosby and Malkin had the same problem this series that Mario and I had when we lost to Florida and New Jersey.

Takeaways:   If you watch the NHL playoffs, you know the rulebook changes.   In the NHL playoffs, interference is more legal than it is during the NHL regular season.   That’s just reality.   But, if interference is legal, how does having an undersized defense, comprised mainly of puck-moving defensemen, provide any benefit?    How does maintaining lines that score 5-on-5 in the regular season with lots of time and space work out when time and space disappears in the postseason?

Action item:  Accept that interference is legal in the NHL playoffs.   Adjust your team, system, and structure accordingly so you can have success when—inevitably—your team encounters the trap and a slew of legal interference.   This likely means swapping out personnel on wing and defense—and it definitely means adjusting structure and strategy to be able to break a trap.  

Jaromir Jagr, Loosely Translated: A 6-Point Plan for Returning the Pittsburgh Penguins to Glory

 AKA:  How To Make the Pittsburgh Penguins a Champion Again


 Jaromir Jagr is older and wiser—and a lot slower on the ice—than he used to be.   After Jagr’s Bruins swept the Penguins, Jagr offered a slew of insightful quotes.   (You can find the great quotes here and here and here. Note:  I write a blog for fun, I couldn’t write this without journalists who asked great questions, so thanks and credit to the journalists who got these great quotes in the first place.)  

Here, I’ve taken the liberty of translating Jagr’s quotes into takeaways and actionable items for Pittsburgh’s management and coaching staff.   

Why a blog series on what Jagr had to say about the 2013 Eastern Conference Finals?     

Because Jagr, at age 41, has learned some things that a younger Jagr didn’t know.   What Pittsburgh hockey fans could forget Jagr insisting things would be just fine with “Jan and Kip” as his linemates?    What Pittsburgh fan could forget thinking, year after year, “Well, we have Jagr and Mario, so we always have a shot?”

What Pittsburgh fan can forget how those late nineties teams never got back to the Stanley Cup Finals?   What Pittsburgh fan can’t look back and see what Jagr now sees:  To win a Cup, even when you're the best player in the world and it isn't close, you need more help than Jan Hrdina and Kip Miller on your number one line come the playoffs.   To win a Cup, you need great defense and great goaltending. While you need All-Stars, you also need Troy Loney or Max Talbot to score some important goals.

The Penguins’ post-series quotes greatly distressed me:  the players, too often, sounded the way a much younger Jagr sounded.   That they just “didn’t execute.”  That they should have done better.   That they should have played better.   The coach sounded pretty much the same way.

Jaromir Jagr’s quotes pointed out what he has learned—and what it would be wise for Pittsburgh’s management, coaching staff, and players to learn if they hope to return to the Stanley Cup Finals in future seasons.  So, without further adieu, let’s begin this series on translations, takeaways, and actionable items for returning the Pittsburgh Penguins to glory.

All taken from the mouth of wise old sage, Mr. Jaromir Jagr.  (And, no, I can’t believe I just typed that-now-true-description of Jagr.)

Without further adieu, here's the Series:  Jaromir Jagr, Loosely Translated:  A 6-Point Plan for Returning the Pittsburgh Penguins to Glory.




Saturday, June 08, 2013

Trading All-Stars


Pleading for a dose of rationality before pulling the trigger on trades you'll regret...

The last time the Penguins traded a franchise player, they didn’t make the playoffs for several years.

If Nashville would somehow want to trade Shea Weber for Kris Letang and one of Pittsburgh’s elite defensive prospects (and I don’t know why Nashville would, so this is speculative moot point), I do that deal in a heartbeat because it makes Pittsburgh better now.   If Montreal wants to trade PK Subban for Letang, I can live with that deal, too.  

I can’t deal with trading Letang for prospects and “a position player”—it doesn’t improve the Penguins NOW, in Sidney Crosby’s prime.   Getting a “scorer” and a prospect in exchange for an All-Star defenseman doesn’t improve where the Penguins are weak NOW.

I can’t even bring myself to think about trading Evgeni Malkin, but suffice to say if one were to consider such utter lunacy, you’d need to get enough points scored, plus goals saved to make up for the 100 points Malkin would be contributing to your line-up (good luck doing that).   If I trade Malkin, I want a young franchise defenseman, a second line center, and 2 goal scoring wingers, or a 1-goal scoring winger and a 3rd line center.   I doubt there’s a franchise that has what I need to get equal value for Malkin, and no other team typically wants to gut their franchise for one player (unless we’re talking the Flyers in 1992 for Lindros). 

Trading All-Stars players—generally speaking—weakens a team unless you are exchanging All-Star players for All-Star players.  Think John Cullen for Ron Francis.   Think Mark Recchi for Rick Tocchet.    And, please, whatever you do, do not think about Jaromir Jagr for prospects whose names I can’t bring myself to write (because, while that's the worst-case scenario, the team that gets the better player usually wins the trade).  

Trading All-Star players—without getting equal return—means you’re more likely to become the Tampa Bay Lightning (borderline playoff team) than a much better team.   And getting “equal return”—as in, “Use the cap space to trade and acquire some other defenseman!” isn’t like a video game.   Franchise defensemen aren’t readily available, and cost a mint.  Franchise centers aren’t readily available, and cost a mint. (  You may have “cap space,” but you won’t be able to acquire other “franchise” players without giving up significant assets.)

I recognize we live in the era of the salary cap and it’s impossible to keep teams forever together and that hard decisions have to be made.

I’d just suggest that in lieu of trading All-Stars, Pittsburgh considers putting the All-Stars they already have in the best position to win with the most appropriate line-mates and defensive partners for the postseason (which is very different than the NHL regular season). 

Because—as the years 2002 through 2006 demonstrated so painfully, you’re more likely—short-term—to weaken your team when you trade a franchise player, especially if you fail to get another franchise player in return.   And, because, as the difference between this year’s Penguins and  the 2011 Penguins should show, you’re more likely to advance in the playoffs (even if not capture the ultimate prize) if you keep your franchise players.   

I can only hope management—in particular, Mario Lemieux (who once, basically, approved the trade of Sergei Zubov for Kevin Hatcher)—takes a look at their team and makes rational decisions to IMPROVE the team, rather than IRRATIONAL decisions based on the disappointing emotions of a playoff loss that was a collective, organizational failure (from the GM's failure to get the right (on-ice, not on-paper) support to the coaching staff's failure to adjust to star players' failure to produce to supporting star players' same failure to produce).

Sometimes, Hockey Happens

1996 Eastern Conference Finals.   Ron Francis is hurt.  Mario Lemieux and Jaromir Jagr just defeated an excellent New York Rangers team in 5 games.   New York’s coach says, “Good luck to the next team that has to stop Mario and Jagr.”   

The Florida Panthers stop Mario and Jagr.

To the tune of 1 goal in 7 games.

Mario is in the Hall of Fame.

Jagr will join Mario in the Hall whenever he decides to hang up his skates.

Mario and Jagr were, individually,  better than any player on that Florida Panthers team.   They still lost that series.    They scored one goal between them.

Sometimes, hockey happens.    Teams win and lose.

Keep that in mind, should you be tempted to scream that it’s time to “blow up the Penguins” or that franchise players aren’t really franchise players.

Mario and Jagr.   In their primes.  One goal against Tom Fitzgerald and the Florida Panthers and their blasted rats.

Yeah, what happened to Sid and Geno in 2013 happened a generation ago to Mario and Jagr—and it will happen to another team replete with future Hall-of-Famers in some upcoming NHL playoff season.

Cause that’s hockey, and that’s the NHL playoffs, and teams win the Stanley Cup, and it’s really hard to win the Stanley Cup—and that’s why we watch, and that’s why we celebrate when our captain hoists the silver chalice.

Wednesday, May 08, 2013

Getting the Best from the Best: Simple, Smart, and Safe


Evgeni Malkin and Kris Letang are two of the most talented hockey players on Coach Dan Bylsma’s 2013 Pittsburgh Penguins roster.  Malkin and Letang can often successfully make plays on the ice that other players would never even dare to attempt.

Coach Dan Bylsma needs to get Malkin and Letang to knock it off, immediately.

In the first-round playoff series against the New York Islanders, Malkin and Letang have made both brilliant plays and terrible plays.  The sum result:  decidedly average performance from a former playoff MVP and a current Norris Trophy nominee.    And decidedly average performance from a team’s best players is not a way to advance in the Stanley Cup playoffs.

But what does Bylsma need from Malkin and Letang, and how does he bring it out of Malkin and Letang?

Facts
 Evgeni Malkin has won a Stanley Cup, a league MVP, and a scoring title with Dan Bylsma as his coach. 

 One of Dan Bylsma’s first moves upon becoming Pittsburgh’s head coach in February of 2009 was to make then-21-year-old Kris Letang a healthy scratch, being very clear that he expected Letang could be a much better player.  In the years since 2009, Letang has steadily grown from a promising, skilled kid playing protected minutes to a player who plays well enough in all situations to be in the conversation for the Norris Trophy every season.

 Factually, Evgeni Malkin and Kris Letang have produced—to elite levels— with Dan Bylsma as their head coach.

Regular Season Observations

 Ever watch the Penguins during the regular season?   Ever notice how Malkin and Letang can just toy with the opposition?    Ever seen Malkin annually part Tampa Bay’s defense and score an amazing goal?  Ever seen Letang—successfully—deke at the blue line and then set up a scoring chance?

Yeah.   They do that all the time in the regular season.   When there’s time and space to do so.  When teams aren’t focusing their entire game plan on—at playoff-level intensity—ferociously hitting them at every chance because they know exactly what Malkin and Letang can do and they’d prefer they didn’t do it to them.

Ever watched Malkin and Letang when games get out of control?   Ever notice how both players try to do way too much, and cause misery for themselves?   They try to take over with their talent.  They try to do too much; they try to do it all themselves (race up ice to create a scoring chance, thread an impossible pass that gets picked off, and things along those lines).   And they end up making mistakes that don’t make sense for players of their talent: they turn over the puck when they shouldn’t, make an inexplicable decision, or take a needless penalty. 
              
 And in the regular season—the good far outweighs the bad.   And you play Letang big minutes and you play Malkin big minutes and they help your team keep the puck away from the opponent most of the game and they put up points and they’re elite players who help make sure your team is one of the best teams in the NHL. 

Playoff Observations
Have you noticed that both Malkin and Letang are giving the puck away too frequently?  Have you noticed that both players have moments where they absolutely look like elite talents, and other moments where they look like anything but elite talents?

If you—as a fan—have noticed, be sure that the opponents have noticed.   Be sure that the coaches on both sides have noticed.

But what do you do?     When it comes to player who—all regular season long, can just toy with other players and general cover over any errors—what happens when there’s just not the same time and space to do that, the exact same way, and those plays that are there in more open ice just aren’t there for the taking? 

A Game 4 Moment (Replicate, Please?)
Did you notice the play that resulted in Pittsburgh’s third goal in Game 4?   Letang contemplated doing something fancy with the puck, and then he just dumped the puck to a place where Matt Cooke could win a battle and retrieve the puck.   It was the safe, simple, and smart play.  And it resulted in a Pittsburgh goal. 

 But did you notice—of course you did—Letang and Malkin turning over the puck and generally thinking if they just pushed and pushed and pushed, their talent would be enough?

Talent has to learn how to make the safe, simple, and smart play.    Malkin and Letang are capable of doing so.

But getting them to the point where they’re using their talent to make the safe and simple play as a matter of course—and only taking that “risk” when there’s no risk at all—

And getting this to happen as a matter of course in incredibly emotional, tightly contested playoff games. 
             
Suffice to say Malkin and Letang haven’t done that—regularly—in the postseason since the Penguins’ last championship (and that timing—while hardly on those two players alone—is not a coincidence).    Dan Bylsma has to hope video helps.   He has to hope conversations, or a kick in the rear, or whatever it is (because I’m not going to pretend I have a clue about the best way to get through to Malkin or Letang), somehow get through to two of his best players.

Because habits where talent alone wins you games—great as that is.   It’s of little use when the playoffs start.    And that’s when talent has to be disciplined to make the safe, simple, and smart play.
                
No matter what the coach says or does or doesn’t do, Malkin and Letang need to use their talent to execute the safe, simple, and smart plays.    But Dan Bylsma’s got to make it his mission that they understood that’s all they have to execute.  Because, if they do that, well—talent really can take care of the rest.   But no talent is sufficient enough to overcome a regular failure to execute fundamental plays.

And while it’s on the players to start executing, it’s also on the coach to let those players know:  “Use your talent to take what’s there, rather than force what’s not there—and trust that your talent making simple, safe, smart plays will be sufficient to take care of the game.”
              
It’s certainly far preferable than “Take this risk, and take that risk” and “then, since at least one of those risks—inevitably—went wrong, do everything you can to take more risks to make up for that risk you just took so we can get back even or reclaim the lead!”

You don’t want to stifle the creativity of your best players.  But just as Jaromir Jagr didn’t become the best player in hockey until he learned to stop beating the same player 4 times, Malkin and Letang—in spite of their already impressive list of accomplishments—still have growing and learning to do in terms of making the smart and simple plays every time.

And a coach doing whatever he must to get that truth to click in is likely a key for any hope the Penguins have for postseason success.    That’s no easy task for Dan Bylsma, of course—getting gifted players to perform at a level commensurate with their abilities is nowhere near as easy as “gifted” makes you think it should be—but it’s one thing he’ll need to figure out if he hopes to win another championship with Malkin and Letang.

Saturday, February 12, 2011

A Love Letter to the NHL
“I Love You, But Seriously, Get Your Act Together”


Dear National Hockey League:

First, a few quick facts about me: I was born in Pittsburgh in 1982. How is this relevant to you? I was two years old when Mario Lemieux was drafted by the Pittsburgh Penguins. I was five years old when then Pittsburgh General Manager Eddie Johnston swung a trade for future Hall of Famer Paul Coffey to become a Penguin. I was seven years old when Mario Lemieux had an incredible point scoring streak and then got hurt and the Pens barely missed the playoffs. I had just turned eight when the Pens were able to draft the player who would ultimately become my all-time favorite, Jaromir Jagr.

Why should the NHL care about me? Because I’ve been a fan of the sport of hockey, and, specifically, of NHL hockey, since I was five years old. When I was five years old, it was Paul Coffey—the Doctor—who made me fall in love with hockey. Watching someone with Coffey’s skill skate the puck up the ice….wow. That kind of speed and skill in an athlete? But I could give a laundry list of reasons why I became a fan, and that laundry list is littered with the Hall of Fame players who defined Penguins hockey in the nineties:

-Mario Lemieux. Enough said.

-Ron Francis. Nicknamed “Saint” Ron or “Ronnie Franchise” for reasons that need no explanation

-The aforementioned Jaromir Jagr and Paul Coffey, still my all-time favorite players

Dear NHL: These are the players who made me fall in love with your sport. They are the ones I tried to imitate (terribly, I am in no way a natural athlete) when I’d play street hockey with my brother and his friends as a kid. These are the players my brother and his teammates (all the way through college) wanted to be. These were the players who made the sport worth watching.

But, lest anyone think I want the NHL to be an All-Star game, let me give you another laundry list of the reason your sport—yes, NHL, your sport, the sport of hockey—is my favorite in all of sports. And it’s going to have very little to do with All-Star players and future Hall-of-Famers. Let me tell you all the reasons why I love your sport, why I’d want my kids to play your sport, all the reasons why I think hockey at its purest, finest, is the greatest sport on earth:

TEAM CONCEPT:
There are lots of team sports, but hockey takes the cake in terms of “team” concept. A goalie will play the entire game. But the most gifted forwards and defensemen can only play half the game. When a superstar finally wins a championship, people throw out all sorts of idiocy like “He’s finally gotten it together!” when the reality, in hockey, especially, is that his general manager has finally surrounded that player with a championship caliber team.

But do you know the awesome part about hockey? A championship caliber team is one where the back-up goalie has to make a ridiculous save in Game 6 and win Game 7 (Devils-Pens, Round 1, 1991), where a team has to overcome injuries to future Hall of Fame talent (no Lemieux and Mullen, Round 2, NYR, 1992, and where the hero is not one of the guys who’s destined for the Hall but just a guy who’s always scored goals when needed in huge games (Max Talbot, Game 7, 2009 Cup Finals).

You know what’s also awesome about hockey? It’s a team sport, and until a team is good enough to win it all, it doesn’t matter how good Lemieux or Jagr or Crosby or Malkin are. It matters how good the team around them—you know, the guys that play the other half of the game—are. Talk about a lesson in needing EVERYONE to achieve results, right?


IT'S ALL ABOUT THE TEAM:
More so than any other sport, hockey players are taught, from an early age, to celebrate team accomplishments over individual ones. In other sports, you’ll find some (note: not all) athletes meaninglessly celebrating touchdowns or home runs in blowout losses. If you want an example of a typical hockey player’s reaction to upping their fantasy stats (and next contract) in a blowout loss, take a look at the response of two Penguins last night to meaningless goals when their team was already down 6-0. Jordan Staal and Kris Letang “celebrated”, if you can call it that, with a half-hearted high-five of the gloves. A trace of a smile barely cracked their faces. Their depleted team was losing, and they’d just scored two goals to make it slightly less of a joke. And their response—good job we scored, but who cares, it doesn’t matter—was entirely appropriate in the circumstances.

Tell me in what other sport you’ll see athletes who GET it. Who get that meaningless scores aren’t to be celebrated. Who could care less about their fantasy statistics when their team’s depleted. Tell me where, other than in the NHL, I can point to athletes who “get” that team matters more than fantasy stats….and who get that there’s no point in excessively celebrating meaningless wins.


"IT IS NEVER ABOUT ME"
Speaking of another thing about hockey players, they’re accused of being the most boring interview ever. And you know what, they are, and I love them for it.

Exhibit A: I listened to an interview with a first-time All Star player this year. Asked why he was playing well, he said not one thing—I am not making this up—about himself or working hard or practicing more or watching video (all things the player does). He deflected credit to his defensive partner, to his teammates, and to his coaches. All of these people, he said, help him. An All-Star player who could brag about how good he is and how awesome he is says not one tiny thing about himself but simply says: I have to keep playing this way and all these people around me, they help me.

And to note that in hockey, this player’s attitude is consistent, across-the-board, among most All-Star players. It is anathema in a hockey locker room to make yourself bigger than the team. An All-Star player is put in his place and fast, by teammates, if he ever thinks he’s bigger than the team.

Tell me where you can find this attitude permeated, consistently, in any other sport, and I’ll tell you won’t. Hockey, due its inherent nature where short shifts have to be the norm for a team to be at its most productive, insists that the most talented players conduct themselves as humble members of a unit. And you know what? What parent doesn’t want their child to learn to act like that?


PLAY THROUGH PAIN
Hockey gets a bad rep for this (too many players have played through serious injuries over the years). But hockey players joke about athletes in other sports because…what, a hangnail and he’s out? A sprained ankle and you’re not playing? In hockey, especially in the playoffs, if you can play, you do play.

The stories are legion: Sergei Gonchar played on a partially torn knee ligament. Players have played through all sorts of injuries, from the relatively minor (yes, seriously) separated shoulder to broken bones to who knows what else.

In hockey, there’s a culture that’s best exemplified by a player who returned to play for the Penguins: “It’s painful, but I can play.”

Exactly. Your team needs you. If you’re in pain, but you can go and help your team more than you hurt it, you do whatever you have to do to go. That’s hockey. And again….what parent doesn’t what their kid to learn that life lesson? Keep going when it hurts.


So, NHL, the above is my love letter to you. I love you. I love your All-Star talent. I love the inherent nature of your sport and all that it teaches. But you have a big problem on your hands, and you have to fix it, and fix it fast. So, hear me out with some issues you’ve got, and then we’ll talk about what to do to solve them.

Hits to the head: I’m talking about this as a separate issue from concussions. You’ve got to stop this and make it perfectly clear: None. Don’t take out hitting. But take out hits to the head. Simply put, take out hits to the head. The same players who don All-Star jerseys compete in the Olympics and were once World Junior stars. They’re fine playing games—physical, brutal games where players still get injured on clean hits—without hits to the head. Just make it clear for everyone, once and for all, and eliminate those hits to the head.

Player safety: This goes from everything to concussions to keeping the ice safe during a game (call the rulebook).
You have to have officials who can keep control of the game. You have to make sure medical protocols are in place.

Vigilante justice: This came up in last night’s Pens-Isles game (prompting this letter). But right now, due to unclear rules about hits and inconsistent discipline, teams are attempting to take matters into their hands. And when they do so in violation of the NHL “code” (you hit our guy, our tough guy will fight the guy who made that hit), the NHL has a major problem on its hands. The league is a joke. The players aren’t safe. If you were a mother or father who had a child participating in that game, would you have feared for their safety? If you were a wife whose husband was playing, what would you have thought? What would you have told your kids if they were watching their father play? Bottom line: Vigilante justice cannot and must not be tolerated.


Here’s the major issue with last night’s game that cannot be allowed to creep across the rest of the NHL: The Islanders were allegedly upset about two clean hits from two Penguins. Letang hit Comeau with a clean shoulder-to-shoulder check that got him ejected from the game (the Pens, it should be noted, accepted a call their hometown fans called “bull----” after it happened and played the rest of the game sans incident) when Comeau was fine. Talbot hit Comeau with another clean hit (deemed so by the league, but not Islanders or their fans), but this one hurt Comeau and left him with a concussion.

Here’s my thing if I choose to play hockey or someday let my sons play hockey: It is a physical, violent sport. The players who play it, each and every game, are going to risk injury, and they’re risking serious injury. In the course of a hockey game, completely accidental plays, with no one intending to hurt anyone, can leave a star player gone for the season with torn ligaments. Completely clean hits that are a part of the game can leave a player hurt, and sometimes seriously hurt. Guess what? If you play hockey, you risk that you’re going to get hurt.

But what I couldn’t stand about last night’s game was the Islanders’ reaction to the previous hits. Rather than do what championship teams are coached to do (take hits like men and get up and play their game), they sought vigilante justice. They were out to hurt people. To deliberately injure opponents. And not an injury that would come about as part of an actual hockey game where a hard, clean check to get the puck separates someone’s shoulder because of an awkward landing. Not a broken ankle that comes from a player blocking a shot. But injuries that came from a deliberate intent to seek revenge for….

Oh, what? The Penguins played hockey? Letang hit Comeau when he had a scoring chance in a game earlier this season? Talbot was playing an aggressive defensive game? Eric Tangradi, a call-up who was trying to prove his worth after having been sent down for being ineffective in two previous NHL games, ends up concussed for simply playing the game and finishing his check?

The Penguins, despite being down by a touchdown, trying to play their game? Letang, still trying to score goals and play the feisty, aggressive game that’s helped him to have his best season thus far in the NHL? The Islanders being upset with Letang daring to be a defesenman who plays physical on their top players (tell me, if Chris Pronger or Chris Chelios played that way, who would be whining..er, never mind, but point is: defenseman play physical)? How dare Letang try to stop Tavares or Okposo from scoring. How dare he go to the net hard. How dare Talbot check a player. How dare the Penguins, down by a touchdown and sans their best players, still attempt to play actual hockey and get back to playing the way they need to play. How dare they play hockey.

And, NHL, that’s the scariest part of what you’ve allowed to spread across the league. Because your discipline is so inconsistent and because the players don’t know what the rules even are, the players—on the Islanders, anyway—don’t seem to recognize actual hockey when it happens. They don’t seem to get that a clean hit is a part of hockey. That don’t seem to understand something that coaches of organizations that win in the playoffs teach their players about winning the Cup.

But let’s take a glimpse of a Penguin, OK (just cause it’s the team I follow, but I am quite confident the coaches of the Flyers and Red Wings and certain other teams could give the same lessons and their fans could point to examples of this with their own players)?

Glimpse: It is a first round playoff game against the Ottawa Senators. Pittsburgh’s Kris Letang is behind his own net to play the puck. He sees two of Ottawa’s highest profile checking line forwards coming at him, and coming at him hard. Both players are going to ram him, and ram him hard. He could bail on the play.

It’s the playoffs. Letang doesn’t bail on the play. Instead, he takes the hit to make the play, and he gets the puck out of the Penguins’ end. The hit hurts. Letang is not paying a bit of attention to the two players who hit him. That’s hockey. He’s already dusted himself up and is hurrying up the ice, either to join a rush or get the change to a fresh defenseman his team needs.

Coaches of teams that win playoff series get that hitting happens as a part of hockey. They get that their teams need to play the same way all the time: play hard, take a hit to make a play, make a hit to take away the puck. Play physical on their top guys, just as they play physical on our top guys. Play physical within the rules. Oh—and if they’re going to do something stupid, we’re going to make them pay by scoring on the power play.

Anyhow, right now, NHL, it seems only a few of your franchises really get this concept. Really understand that hitting is a part of hockey when a player is near the puck. Really understand that defensemen who aspire to be elite have to play hard against the league’s top forwards. Really understand that hitting, actual hitting—not blindside headshots or blindside hits when no one’s near the puck—is part and parcel of hockey and no one needs to defend against them

(FYI, the appropriate response to a stupid retaliation--for both teams-- against a clean hit can be seen in 24/7: Malkin was penalized for retaliating against a clean hit a Flyer made on Crosby. The Flyers scored on the ensuing power play. Due to that power play goal, the Pens lost the game. After the game, the Pittsburgh coach clearly told his team and player that such retaliation was unacceptable. The Pens' coaching staff would reiterate the same message about retaliating against hits in preparing for a game against another high-profile opponent.)

But, dear NHL and the sport of hockey I love so much….could you, pretty please, with your enforcement of the rules, and communications to organizations, coaches, and players, help them to understand what this fan of the Penguins understands and what so many Islanders failed to understand?

That Letang and Talbot—no matter if the rest of their careers suck loads—already have their names on the Stanley Cup for a reason. Because they understand that hockey is hockey. Not something else. Because they took hits to make plays. Because they made hits to make plays.

And you know how wonderful that is every year, NHL? Why everyone loves when the Stanley Cup is raised?

Because that’s what hockey is all about. The players knowing the game, and what it’s about and what it’s not—and every player, from the enforcer to the All-Star, doing that in a team concept until one team wins 16 times.

Last night wasn’t hockey. And it’s not because Kris Letang couldn’t go do what he did in the All-Star game and skate around with no one hitting him. It’s because the Islanders were out to avenge the fact that the members of the Pittsburgh Penguins dared to play physical, actual hockey against their team. It’s because the Islanders, in “retaliation” for a couple of clean hits and losing a game in embarrassing fashion, couldn’t settle for what the Penguins have been taught to aim to settle for (winning the game in embarrassing fashion on the scoreboard).

The Islanders didn’t play hockey. In winning a blowout, all they revealed is that they don’t know how to play winning hockey.

But the Islanders also revealed that the NHL has a lot to fix. The NHL has to teach franchises (sadly, in the case of the Isles, one that once epitomized the class of the league, and no longer does) about what hockey is and what isn’t.

I’d suggest starting with banning all headshots and with swift reaction to any intent-to-injure that’s not a part of the hockey game at all.

Clearer rules and clearer enforcement of expectations?

Maybe then, when a suspension has to be handed down for something else, it’s few and far between. Because the players are on the ice are actually playing hockey. John Tavares is cleanly beating Kris Letang, or Kris Letang is checking Tavares and taking the puck off him. But two NHL players are doing what they do: playing hockey. Attempting to score, attempting to defend.

That’s hockey.

Last night, in the words of the Penguins’ coach and one of their still-standing All-Star players, was not.

And NHL, I love hockey. So, please, would you do whatever it takes to make sure hockey is played?

And while you’re at it—defend all that hockey talent from those who don’t have a clue how to play actual hockey. Because, remember, who made you fall in love with hockey in the first place? I guarantee you’ll tell me something like mine: It was either a star player or some component of an awesome team game when a player who's never been a "star" stepped up and helped his team win a huge game that mattered.

It wasn’t a brawl.

Fix it while you still have a chance…..hockey is violent and physical and we lose enough players to injuries and illness that happen as part of life and part of the game. We don’t need more losses of real, live hockey players from unclear rules and terrible enforcement of existing rules.

Dear NHL: I love you, I love hockey, but you’ve got fix this.

Love,

Your Long-Term Fan